I. The Core Allegation and Incident Timeline

The incident revolves around a grave and deeply sensitive allegation concerning the sanctity of food served to Hindu students residing at the Bijoy-24 Hall of Rajshahi University (RU). The specific date of the occurrence is November 28, 2025, during the serving of the hall's standard dinner meal, which was priced at ₹70 that day.

The primary complainant is Sabuj Chandra Sarkar, a student of the 2022-23 session in the Marketing Department. According to his account, the meal menu for the evening consisted of Polao, Chicken Curry, Beef Curry, and Bengal Gram (Boot) Lentil. The critical allegation is that beef offal, locally known as 'Gorur Bot' (the internal organs/tripe of a cow), was mixed into the Bengal Gram Lentil (Boot Dal) without the knowledge or consent of the Hindu students, who are strictly prohibited from consuming beef due to religious beliefs.

II. Discovery and Confirmation

The discovery was not made by Sabuj himself initially, but by a friend named Jubayer, who alerted Sabuj that beef offal had been used in the lentil preparation. Sabuj, upon hearing the concerning news, took immediate steps to verify the claim.

• Initial Verification: He first approached another fellow student nearby who confirmed the observation regarding the presence of 'Gorur Bot' in the lentil.

• Confirmation by Staff: To further solidify the suspicion, Sabuj directly questioned one of the dining workers. The worker reportedly corroborated the information, confirming the use of beef offal in the lentil.

• Admission by Dining In-Charge: The most critical confirmation, according to Sabuj, came when he took the matter to the Dining In-Charge. The In-Charge, when questioned, allegedly admitted to the use of 'Gorur Bot' in the lentil dish.

III. The Complainant's Standpoint and Demand for Justice

Sabuj Chandra Sarkar's reaction underscores the severity of the alleged offense. He highlighted the following points:

1. Religious Sensitivity Violation: He stressed that a large number of Hindu (Sanatoni) students regularly consume food at Bijoy-24 Hall. Many may have unknowingly consumed the beef-laced lentil, which constitutes a profound violation of their religious and spiritual principles.

2. Act of Irresponsibility and Negligence: Sabuj labeled the incident as "extremely regrettable and irresponsible behavior" on the part of the hall administration and dining management.

3. Demand for Accountability: He emphasized the necessity for immediate "accountability" from the responsible parties, asking why such an action was taken despite knowing the religious sensitivities of the Hindu student population.

4. Criminal Designation: Sabuj went so far as to categorize the act as a "criminal offense" (অপরাধমূলক কাজ).

5. Call for Administrative Action: His core demand is for the university administration to take "strict measures" and provide a guarantee that such a sensitive incident will "never happen again in the future."

IV. University's Response and Student Community's Demand

As of the report's publication time (19 hours prior), there has been no formal statement or official comment from the Rajshahi University administration regarding the incident.

However, the general consensus and collective demand from the Hindu student community are clear and resolute:

• Investigation: A thorough and impartial investigation into the sensitive incident is paramount.

• Punitive Action: Necessary punitive and disciplinary action must be taken against those found responsible.

• Safe and Respectful Environment: The ultimate goal is to ensure that all students can consume meals in the hall in a safe, respectful, and dignified environment that honors and respects their religious beliefs.

V. Analysis of the Situation and Potential Implications

The incident raises serious questions about the operational procedures, staff training, and oversight within the hall's dining facilities, especially concerning the segregation and preparation of meals for students with different dietary and religious requirements.

• Breach of Trust: This represents a significant breach of trust between the students and the hall authorities responsible for their well-being and basic needs.

• Religious Harmony: Such an incident, if proven true, could potentially threaten the communal harmony within the residential hall and the university campus at large.

• Future Policy: The outcome of this case will likely set a precedent for future policies regarding meal preparation, menu planning, and religious accommodation in all residential halls across the university.